
A leading education specialist has attacked Government proposals to raise the participation age to 18. In an essay ‘Why I Am Against Raising the Participation Age’, Professor Alan Smithers, Director of the Centre for Education and Employment Research at the University of Buckingham, argues that compulsion at 16 comes far too late, and the policy “will lead to further alienation and disaffection.”
Smithers’ essay features in Staying the Course: Changes to the Participation Age and Qualifications, The collection, edited by Conor Ryan (former advisor to Tony Blair and David Blunkett), includes a foreword by Rt. Hon. Ed Balls MP, Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families. published today by the Social Market Foundation.
Professor Smither’s attack contrasts sharply with an essay by former government advisor Sir Michael Barber, who makes the case for raising the participation age. Barber argues that education to age18 is essential for a first class education system. He presents a road-map for how the change should be implemented, and argues that the rise is a logical progression from all the education reforms that have taken place over the past century: “Its time to implement the 1918 Education Act!”
Elsewhere in the collection:
Professor Smithers will today present his arguments against raising the participation age in the debate at the House of Commons to launch the publication. He will be joined by David Willetts MP, Shadow Secretary of State for Universities, Innovation and Skills. Arguing for a rise in the participation age will be Barry Sheerman MP, Chairman, Children, Schools and Families Select Committee, and Ann Rossiter, Director of the Social Market Foundation.