New research from the Social Market Foundation (SMF) think tank finds that many self-employed workers get a worse deal at work than traditional employees – but may also be failing to enjoy the traditional benefits of self-employment, such as greater autonomy.
The new SMF paper, entitled The employment divide: is it possible to simplify the distinction between self-employment and employment?, says that many self-employed people may look and behave very much like employees and yet are less likely to be paid for overtime, lack the rights and protections of employees and even lack the autonomy which many think self-employment confers.
It concludes that a significant proportion of self-employed people do not enjoy the autonomy associated with self-employment; and yet also fail to enjoy some of the rights and protections that those in employment, with similar levels of autonomy, have access to.
The report urges the government to consider measures which reduce the incentive for firms to treat workers as self-employed, rather than employees, such as:
- equalising the level of National Insurance Contributions over time; and
- limiting the option of self-employment to higher-paid workers, who have the bargaining power to access the benefits of self-employment while trading off rights and protections (this too would have to be a gradual change)
This paper is part of a broader programme of work which the SMF is undertaking, looking into the position of self-employed workers in the labour market. This research is kindly supported by PRISM. The Social Market Foundation retains full editorial control over all of its outputs.
The author of the paper, SMF director Emran Mian, said:
“This new research suggests that self-employed workers may be getting the worst of both worlds. At the very least, people may look and behave very much like employees and yet lack the rights and protections of employees. Equally, they may in fact be self-employed – without a single employer responsible for giving them tasks or paying them – and yet fail to benefit from the tax treatment of other self-employed people.
“The two categories of employment and self-employment simplify and often distort a much more complex labour market in which people are working and being paid in a range of different ways, including limited company contractors and workers employed through an umbrella company.
“The challenge this variation poses is that our tax system and the rights and protections offered through employment law may no longer fit the reality of the labour market.
“The SMF will shortly begin a process of gathering further evidence from end users, recruiters, contractors and providers to better understand the issues raised in this paper. We hope that trade bodies, representative groups and other stakeholders will help us to reach organisations and individuals who are affected.”
Crawford Temple, chief executive of PRISM, said:
“The initial findings suggest that the closer you look, the less easy it is to differentiate between the way the self-employed and employed are engaged.
“The traditional distinctions have been eroded and are becoming more complex as time goes on, shifting as both individuals and companies use ever more varied modes of engagement, often spurred by the effect of technology on working practices.
“The world of work has evolved and as we have been saying for some time now, employment and tax legislation has failed to keep pace. Many changes made are no more than sticking plasters and fail to address the underlying issues. We are excited to be sponsoring this thorough and in-depth look at these issues in the hope that potential solutions emerge that preserve Britain’s flexible workforce and competitiveness, as well as giving workers adequate rights and protections where they are required.”
Aside from employment status, it can be difficult to find differences in the data between self-employed workers and employees. The variation within each employment status may be more significant than the difference between them.
There are nevertheless some important differences which emerge:
- Self-employed workers are less likely to be paid for overtime: 71% of self-employed who work overtime do so unpaid.
- Self-employed workers are less likely to receive training: only half as likely as employees.
- Self-employed workers take fewer days off sick: half as likely to take sick days.
- Self-employed workers are less able to save money from their earnings: 11 percentage point gap between self-employed and employees
- Many self-employed workers lack autonomy. It is often assumed that self-employed experience higher levels of autonomy at work as part of the trade-off for being self-employed. But, while broadly true, 1 in 5 self-employed do not report a lot of autonomy over their job tasks; and 1 in 3 do not report a lot of autonomy over working hours.The IR35 and ‘supervision, direction, control’ test are founded on the principle that the self-employed should be totally autonomous with a clear distinction between the way they are engaged and the way employees are engaged.
Potential policy options
The nub of the challenge may be that a significant proportion of self-employed do not enjoy the autonomy associated with self-employment; and yet also fail to enjoy some of the rights and protections that those in employment, with similar levels of autonomy, have access to.
Tackling this may require reducing the financial incentive for firms of treating workers as self-employed rather than employees. This could be done over time by equalising the level of National Insurance Contributions.
Another approach could be to limit the option of self-employment to higher-paid workers, where we might more confidently assume that they have the bargaining power to access the benefits of self-employment while trading off rights and protections. This too would have to be a gradual change. We also recognise that this might cause issues for start-up entrepreneurs and that this would need to be addressed.
Thinking about such options, and we will develop others during the project, is likely to be appropriate as the distinction between self-employment and employment will come under further pressure in the years ahead.
Notes to editors:
A copy of the new SMF paper, ‘The employment divide: is it possible to simplify the distinction between self-employment and employment?’, is attached to this release.
As stated above, the SMF will shortly begin a process of gathering further evidence from end users, recruiters, contractors and providers to better understand the issues raised in this paper. To find out more about this process, please contact David Mills, SMF communications director on email@example.com.
About the paper:
This paper is part of a broader programme of work which the SMF is undertaking, looking into the position of self-employed workers in the labour market. This research is kindly supported by PRISM. The Social Market Foundation retains full editorial control over all of its outputs. The paper draws on a range of data sources, including tax data from HM Revenue and Customs, the Labour Force Survey and the Understanding Society dataset.
It reports on some early analysis from the project and begins to explore some policy options for the future. We have already noted that there are significant data gaps and there is a wider question around whether the characteristics of employment or self-employment that we can observe in the data are distorted by how workers identify themselves. To tackle some of these issues, SMF will work with a broad range of business organisations over the next three months to survey workers who are at the crossroads of employment and self-employment. We hope that this will provide a better basis on which to base policy recommendations. Those recommendations will feature as part of a final report from this project in Spring 2017.
About the Social Market Foundation:
The Social Market Foundation (SMF) is an independent, non-partisan think tank. We believe that fair markets, complemented by open public services, increase prosperity and help people to live well. We conduct research and run events looking at a wide range of economic and social policy areas, focusing on economic prosperity, public services and consumer markets. We engage with policymakers and opinion formers, including Ministers, MPs, civil servants, regulators, businesses, charities and the media. The SMF is resolutely independent, and the range of backgrounds and opinions among our staff, trustees and advisory board reflects this.
PRISM is a not for profit professional trade association that represents and promotes its members’ interests who all operate within the professional payment intermediaries sector. The sector covers providers who offer support to temporary workers and recruitment companies by providing payroll services, employing workers through an umbrella company structure, and accountancy services support to workers who operate through their own limited company, often referred to as a PSC.
To interview the report author SMF director Emran Mian please contact:
David Mills, SMF communications director – firstname.lastname@example.org